Stop Playing Corporate Dodgeball…Yeah I’m Talking To You!

by Phil Gerbyshak on March 12, 2010

NOTE from Phil: What follows is a guest post from Nilofer Merchant, author of The New How. I thought you’d enjoy this insightful article.

It’s been more than a year since we stood at the precipice of economic meltdown and my alarm bells are ringing because we haven’t really changed how we do business. The cliff is still there, and if we don’t find better ways to drive meaningful value, many more of us will be going over the edge next time. Possibly in the double-dip scenario many economists are talking about today.

After the first anniversary of the fall of Lehman Brothers, big acquisitions are back. Cisco bought Tandberg to beef up their video collaboration push. Intel bought Wind River to go into the embedded space. And Adobe bought Omniture to monetize and measure content. But most mergers miss their predicted goals.

So why do companies keep doing them to grow?

Corporate Dodgeball

I am convinced that every company has untapped capacity for growth and success within its own four walls. But we are so busy playing a game I call ‘Corporate Dodgeball’ that we fail to drive great unifying ideas and success through our organizations.

We need to stop – Actually, I mean to say: YOU need to stop.

Unless we change the HOW of what got us into trouble, we won’t just end up back at the cliff edge again, we’ll dive straight over it. It’s time to figure out what and HOW we need to change.

THE MISTAKE WE’RE MAKING

We act like victims of the economy, but in many ways we are doing this to ourselves. We play corporate dodgeball instead of galvanizing our groups to own success. We are looking external to our companies when by the very way we work to set direction and innovate, we are limiting our company growth and success.

YOU’VE PLAYED IT TOO

Have you ever stared at a crack in the ceiling rather than taking on some issue you knew about? Perhaps you told yourself “everyone already knows,” or ”they won’t listen” if you raised an issue? Have you ever tucked away relevant data, or sugar coated issues, as information got messaged up the chain of command?

We duck the inherent tensions in business. We avoid conflict and aim for group harmony. Do the issues go away? No. And when they bubble back up? Yep, more dodgeball. That leaves a gap in the organization. If it doesn’t get fixed, revenues fall, and whose paycheck suffers? Yours. Mine. Everyone’s. Corporate dodgeball doesn’t build better products or invent the future. It creates mediocrity and prevents companies from achieving their goals.

STOP. STOP NOW.

So we leave our potential on the table, and don’t do our best to win in the marketplace. We may get lucky once in a while, but we don’t have the ability to win markets repeatedly.

Now Imagine if…. Everyone in an organization owned the company direction and we were all aligned to make success happen. You would stop wasting time, money, incredible opportunities and move forward effectively.

HOW TO DO IT

1. Change the Norm of “I tell, You Do” to “We think, each do”

Company success is not someone else’s responsibility. It is ours. So we each need to know what matters and why.

We must share – in detail – why decisions are made so that everyone knows how to make their part work with it. If you don’t know, ask. Your responsibility is to know where, how and WHY you fit in to any project. We need to know enough to see if things don’t exactly tie out. When we know the nuances of decisions, we can adjust our aim, as needed, while staying aligned with our broader crew. We tune our work to the bigger goal and succeed. Which is the point of business, isn’t it?

2. Stop Playing Corporate Dodgeball and deal with issues upfront.

We MUST iron out interdependencies and risks between silos, projects, and features. Don’t run from a discussion with different points of view; it is a necessary part of the process of creating something new. By addressing tensions, we (a) discover viable options, and (b) gain shared clarity of what matters and why.

Dealing with issues is a “pay me now or pay me later” situation. The tension is in there; learn to deal with it early cuz it’s cheaper than failures down the road.

3. No longer task, insist on ‘take’.

We need to move from a “Here’s your Task” to a “Do you Take” approach. Do you take responsibility, take ownership, and take accountability? It’s vital that people sign up willingly to what they will do, and are not coerced. This avoids the “no one told me, I never agreed to this” dialog that happens when people don’t buy into their tasks.

We must each go from being a voiceless individual contributor without responsibility, to become a co-creator of the future. Co-creators advocate, champion, and lobby for the best ideas to help the company win. Being co-creators doesn’t mean I do your job, or you do mine. Instead, we watch each other’s backs as we design our future of success, but then each of us owns the part we own.

It’s not about title, it’s about attitude. Get one that works.

REINVENTION FROM THE INSIDE-OUT IS POSSIBLE.

I work with some great companies in Silicon Valley. Businesses that win consistently hold the characteristics I’ve named. So when I see the business community struggling with dodgeball-as-usual, I want to shake them up, to make them address our new reality. I’ve written a manifesto on this topic of the new rules of business.

The future will not be created. The future will be co-created— by all of us, and if we don’t change the way we’re playing this game of business, we deserve what we get. How we play the game matters. Dodgeball doesn’t work. We need a New How for how business sets direction and creates better business outcomes.

About the author: Nilofer Merchant, CEO, strategist and author, is a leading authority on creating business strategy to achieve success. She has honed her unique, collaborative approach to solving tough problems while working with and for companies like Adobe, Apple, Nokia, Symantec, HP and others. She is the author of the book, The New How: Creating Business Solutions through Collaborative Strategy (O’Reilly). It is available on wherever books are sold.

Flickr photo credit to: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielslaughter/3416051533/

Related posts:

  1. Who’s Talking About You? If you’re online more than a little, it’s important...
  2. Building Your Network by @briantracy A guest post from Brian Tracy, author of No...
  3. Goodbye – Hello Today is my last official day as an associate...
  4. The Five Disciplines That Make Great Managers Note from Phil: What follows is a guest post...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

16 Tweets

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

Todd 'tojosan' Jordan March 12, 2010 at 5:54 pm

So many times we go to meetings and the managers are all about keeping people happy instead of focusing how to move things to the most productive and beneficial results. I find myself in those meetings all the time.

A lot of that comes in the IS teams. We are told not to question the users when they ask for things. Heck, a significant portion of requests are redundant with existing functionality, another portion ways to get yet one more report that isn’t required, or to get it in Excel.

It’s rare that something that’s going to drive profits margin, production capability or even process quality comes along. Even rarer yet is a game changing idea. Those die long before a meeting that crosses teams.

Things aren’t likely to change in spite of great pieces like yours. I do hope though, and try to coach others to approach things differently.
Crossing fingers,
Todd @tojosan Jordan

Reply   More from author

Phil Gerbyshak March 20, 2010 at 3:56 pm

You’re a great manager Todd! Thanks for keeping ideas alive!

Reply   More from author

Kare Anderson March 13, 2010 at 3:45 pm

Spot on Phil. In an increasingly connected world the twin personal traits that enable any organization to optimize opportunity and performance are
1) enabling employees to use their top talent as much as possible (“Strengths” per Marcus Buckingham and,
2) supporting their capacity to self-organize to collaborate, especially with people unlike them to solve problems and capture opportunities.

The key to that later capacity is to understand the simplest, most versatile steps to forge that collaboration. Here’s what we used in forging issue teams under time-pressure for the Obama presidential campaign:
http://www.movingfrommetowe.com/2009/03/17/opportunity-makers-are-the-true-leaders-in-a-flattening-world/
+
http://www.movingfrommetowe.com/2009/01/19/build-strong-teams-the-obama-way/

Reply   More from author

Phil Gerbyshak March 20, 2010 at 3:57 pm

Thanks for the tips and the links Kare! You’re wise and I appreciate you sharing with me and the rest of my readers.

Reply   More from author

Brian Fette March 14, 2010 at 9:06 am

Very insightful article, can’t say I can express it that clearly myself. I do have a strong sense something has gone off the tracks with the model of a corporation in 2010. The best I can say it is we have 3 roles: first, private individual, second a consumer, third an employee. The culture of corporations has now lost touch with two of those three, in some cases all three. You can dictate behavior to your employees, but if you can’t do it to private individuals and consumers how does this model sustain itself?

Reply

Phil Gerbyshak March 20, 2010 at 3:58 pm

You ask some really good questions Brian. How DO we create that sustainable culture of awareness, innovation and accountability? This article offers some tips. I’d love to hear YOUR thoughts on how we can do more.

Reply   More from author

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: